Why rounded bottom Rockers are not such a hot idea.
What I am talking about here is when the bottom surface of the rocker is
radiused so that the rocker resembles a bent broom stick. (the part that
contacts the floor is rounded from side to side)
The reason this is done, I believe, is that it makes alignment of the
rockers a "no brainer" in that you do not have to worry about it. If the
rockers are not aligned exactly it will never be noticed. Although this does
make the construction of a rocking chair easier, this method is not without
it's problems.
The real dilemma here is that the area of the rocker contacting the floor is
quite small, a little less than 1/8 square inch. When an average sized
person sits in this chair the force exerted from the rocker to the floor
will be over 1000 pounds per square inch. This is going to cause a fairly
rapid compression and wearing away of the rocker where it contacts the
floor.
Given that the portion of the rocker that is used when the chair is being
rocked is less than 12 inches, that means that when as little as one eighth
of an inch of the rocker bottom is worn away in the center of the rocking
surface, this will cause an increase in "apparent" rocker radius from 42
inches to 59 inches.
Fifty nine inches is an unacceptably large rocker radius and will not
provide a good rock. BUT as the change will be somewhat gradual it will not,
in all probability, be noticed by the chair owner. However if a new rocking
chair was placed next to the chair that had been rocked for a year or so,
the difference would be immediately evident.

Back